![]() ![]() ![]() The proposed method allows the effectiveness of the currently existing anti-drone systems to be evaluated and for new methods for detecting and neutralising drones to be proposed. This method allows for the effectiveness of the entire anti-drone system to be assessed on the basis of measuring the probability of detection and neutralisation of drones in real conditions. Because there are a variety of technical solutions for the detection and neutralisation of drones, and different location and weather conditions, a universal method is proposed based on probability calculations and neutralisation of drones, using mathematical formulas. Attacks involving the use of drones, both in wartime and in incidents of terrorism, are also analysed and existing anti-drone solutions assessed. In order to suggest a new method for assessing the effectiveness of anti-drone systems, an analysis of the scientific literature and other documents describing existing anti-drone systems has been carried out. The paper proposes a method for assessing the effectiveness of systems for detecting and neutralising unmanned aerial vehicles. Since drones can be used to attack protected structures, they need to be protected by an anti-drone system. Anyone in charge of a facility that is crucial for the reliable functioning of a state is obliged to ensure an acceptable level of security. As they are able to operate like individual aircraft, the number of ways they can be used for terrorist activity is practically unlimited. A human then said, Yes, we want to shoot at that target.Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) pose a threat to buildings and facilities important to the security of the state. “The artificial intelligence identified geo-located enemy targets. “So obviously the technology exists, to remove the human right the technology exists, but the United States Army, an ethical based organization - that’s not going to remove a human from the loop to make decisions of life or death on the battlefield, right? We understand that,” explained Coffman. When asked how the Army was implementing the Department of Defense’s principles of ethical AI use adopted earlier this year, Coffman pointed to the human barrier between AI systems and lethal decisions. With all of the AI engagements, the Army ensured there was a human in the loop to provide oversight of the algorithms' recommendations. ![]() The drone was also equipped with the Maven Smart System and Algorithmic Inference Platform, a product created by Project Maven, a major Department of Defense effort to use AI for processing full motion video.Īccording to one Army officer, the capabilities of the Maven Smart System and Dead Center overlap, but placing both on the modified Gray Eagle at Project Convergence helped them to see how they compared. With Dead Center, the Gray Eagle was able to process the sensor data it was collecting, identifying a threat on its own without having to send the raw data back to a command post for processing and target identification. In other scenarios, a MQ-1C Gray Eagle drone was able to identify and target a threat using the on-board Dead Center payload. Prometheus and FIRESTORM weren’t the only AI capabilities on display at Project Convergence. Army demonstrated the ability to pass control around of a Gray Eagle unmanned aircraft system like the one pictured here using a networked system at China Lake on August 26. Perhaps most surprising is how quickly FIRESTORM was integrated into Project Convergence. The process from identifying the target to sending those orders happened faster than it took the projectile to reach the target. Operators approved the algorithm’s choice, and promptly the cannon fired a projectile at the target located 40 kilometers away. In that first engagement, FIRESTORM recommended the use of an Extended-Range Cannon Artillery. FIRESTORM speeds up that process and eliminates any potential misunderstandings. Right now, that sort of deconfliction would have to take place over a phone call between operators. Just as important, FIRESTORM provides critical target deconfliction, ensuring that multiple weapons systems aren’t redundantly firing on the same threat. ![]() Operators can assess and follow through with the system’s recommendations with just a few clicks of the mouse, sending orders to soldiers or weapons systems within seconds of identifying a threat. Once new threats are entered into the program, FIRESTORM processes the terrain, available weapons, proximity, number of other threats and more to determine what the best firing system to respond to that given threat. The AI system works within the Tactical Assault Kit. Army leaders were effusive in praising FIRESTORM throughout Project Convergence. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |